I have been writing a series of posts that I have titled the Atheist and the Christian discussion.
- The first post was on the evangelistic message of both, which you can read here.
- The second post was about the true nature of Atheism, which you can read here.
This is my third post in the series in which I will look at the subject of Deism verses Theism. This is an important subject to discuss, for in the pursuit of truth, the Atheist finds they have to ditch the frame work of Atheism and embrace the frame work of Agnosticism, in which they now admit that there is a possibility of a God that was involved in the creation process. However unlike the Theist who believes that God is actively involved in the worlds events, will intervene in human affairs and at times suspend what is considered to be natural laws, they embrace the position of Deism which denies all such involvement.
This is an important nuance to note so as to avoid the misconstruing of each others stance and belief within what each believes in regards to the existence of God. While its important to note there are differences between what is known as ‘Classic’ and ‘Modern’ or ‘Enlightened’ deism, they are bound within the framework of Atheism in which they will scoff at and dismiss any thought or claims to any form of supernatural experience.
This position is no different to that of the Atheist in which they ultimately claim to have the knowledge of all things, dismissing the possibility of there being a variety ways of knowing and experiencing God. This is an important framework to acknowledge; for if the deist was to be honest in their pursuit of truth, they will have to admit that there is a possibility of a Theistic God.
For the reality is that like the Atheist: the Deist cannot know for sure whether another’s supernatural experience is truth or not. They cannot claim with all honesty that God cannot or will not intervene within the framework of humanity and worldly affairs. In many ways this places the Deist in no mans land. They can no longer go back to the internal comfort and delusion of Atheism; for that direction no longer holds any form of intellectual and personal honesty. They now find that their intellectual position of Deism is also tentative and indeed is framed within the dishonest framework of having complete knowledge.
Therefore if the Deist was to be honest in their pursuit of truth, they have to admit to the possibility of a Theistic God, and if they can admit to the possibility of a Theistic God, they can no longer with any form of credible integrity and internal honesty say with any finality that Deism is truth.
Therefore they now find themselves to be in the position of being an Theistic Agnostic.